Search Results for "Haryana Civil Services (Revised Pension) Rules 2009"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition Quashing Recovery from Gratuity in Pay Fixation Error Case. Recovery of Excess Payment Made to Deceased Government Employee Without Notice Violates Natural Justice and Cannot Be Deducted from Death Gratuity.

The petitioner, Jayshri w/o Sanjay Chandode, is the widow of Sanjay Bhagirath Chandode, a government employee who worked as a peon in the office of Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals for Interest on Delayed Pension to Retired Teachers of Government Aided Colleges in Haryana — Pension is Not a Bounty but a Right, and Delay in Payment Must Be Compensated with Interest.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which set aside the grant of interest on delayed payment of revised pens...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Alleged Excess Payments from D.Ed College Employees — Recovery Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Refixation of Pay Scale and Grade Pay Set Aside as Unilateral and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

The judgment concerns a group of nine writ petitions filed by employees of D.Ed colleges in Maharashtra, challenging the recovery of amounts allegedly...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Reimbursement of Medical Expenses for Government Servant's Mother Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 1961. The court held that the term 'family' includes dependent parents and the impugned rule and circular were ultra vires.

The petitioner, Shri Anil Dattatraya Kulkarni, a judicial officer serving as Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur, filed a writ petition under Artic...