Search Results for "Harshad Mehta"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Harshad Mehta"

42 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Impleadment in Writ Petition Concerning Demolition of Building — Applicant Claims Ownership of Flat and Seeks to Protect Possession. The court held that the applicant has a direct interest in the property and should be heard before any order affecting his rights is passed.

13 Dec 2023

The judgment pertains to an interim application filed by Nagesh Madhava Suvarna seeking impleadment in a pending writ petition. The writ petition was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Form-3 Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for Assessment Year 2003-2004 — Designated Authority Directed to Recompute Amount Payable After Considering Refund Already Paid. The Court held that the Designated Authority must consider refunds paid under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 while computing the amount payable under the DTVSV Act, and apply the principle of set off under Section 245 of the IT Act.

25 Aug 2021

The Petitioner, Cooperative Rabobank U.A., a bank established in the Netherlands and part of the Rabobank Group, is a regular assessee under the Incom...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.

31 Jan 2019

The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Delivers Judgment in Securities Fraud Case — Accused Face Charges Under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act for Cheating, Forgery, and Criminal Conspiracy

1 Nov 2018

This criminal case arises from the 1992 securities scam, which severely impacted India's economy. The prosecution alleged that multiple accused person...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Bank Officer in Securities Scam Case — Departmental Inquiry Findings Not Vitiated by Delay or Lack of Evidence. The court held that the petitioner, an Assistant General Manager, was validly compulsorily retired for misconduct in allowing irregular transactions through a broker's account, causing loss to the bank.

31 Jul 2017

The petitioner, A.D. Padhey, was an Assistant General Manager with the State Bank of India, heading the Personal Banking Division. He was served with ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case for Notified Person Under Special Court Act. Interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of Income Tax Act, 1961 not chargeable due to assets being vested in Custodian.

7 Mar 2012

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which held that the assessee, ...

High Court

Special Court Dismisses Discharge Application in Securities Scam Case — Prima Facie Case Found Against Accused Under Sections 120B, 420 IPC and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conspiracy and Cheating Allegations Supported by Material on Record, Court Refuses to Discharge Accused at Charge Stage.

21 Jul 2006

The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) at Mumbai was hearing a case arising from a complaint lodged on 23-3-1993...

High Court

Bombay High Court Appoints Court Receiver in Property Dispute Between Family Members Over Sonal Building and Flat No.3A. Court Receiver appointed under Order XL CPC for building and flat, with power to appoint agent for use on payment of compensation.

30 Sep 2005

The present Notice of Motion was taken out by the plaintiff, Rohit Vanmalidas Mehta, in a suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The dispute perta...

High Court

Special Court Dismisses Discharge Application in Securities Scam Case — Prima Facie Case Made Out for Criminal Conspiracy and Misappropriation of Public Funds. Applicant-Accused No.12 Failed to Show No Ground for Framing of Charges Under Sections 409, 467, 471 IPC and Section 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

6 Jun 2005

The applicant, Suresh S. Babu, accused No.12, filed an application for discharge in Special Case No. 4 of 1993 before the Special Court constituted un...

High Court

Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) at Bombay Allows Custodian's Application for Declaration of Properties as 'Proceeds of Crime' Under Special Court Act, 1992. Properties Held by Legal Heirs of Notified Person Harshad S. Mehta and Related Entities Declared as Proceeds of Crime and Directed to be Forfeited to the Custodian.

30 Nov -0001

The Custodian appointed under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 filed an application (Misc. Appli...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)