Search Results for "Group C Employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Group C Employee"

5 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Excess Pay; Confirms Pay Revision But Sets Aside Recovery Citing Rafiq Masih. Recovery of Excess Salary from Group C Employee Impermissible Under Principles in State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih When No Misrepresentation Found and Over Five Years Elapsed.

17 Jul 2026

The Madras High Court considered a writ petition filed by a Stenographer Grade I seeking to quash a notice and proceedings for recovery of Rs.2,59,654...

High Court

High Court of Madras Partly Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Pay; Recovery Set Aside but Pay Revision Upheld. Court Applies Principles from State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih, Holding Recovery Impermissible When Employee Belongs to Group C Service and No Misrepresentation, While Confirming Audit-Based Pay Revision.

8 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Sivasakthi, a Computer Operator working at the Principal District Court,...

High Court

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Excess Pay from Steno-Typist. Recovery Set Aside on Grounds of Hardship as Employee Belonged to Group C Service, Excess Payment Exceeded Five Years, and No Misrepresentation Found, Following State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

2 Jul 2026

The dispute arose when the petitioner, K. Amutha, a Steno-Typist serving in the judicial department of the State of Tamil Nadu, was confronted with a ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Suspension Order of Group C Employee Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 10(4)(b) of KCS (CCA) Rules, 1957 — Suspension Without Contemplation of Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid. The court held that the suspension order must record reasons and be based on contemplation of disciplinary proceedings, failing which it is unsustainable.

11 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Shri S. Nagaraja, a Group C employee working as a Second Division Assistant at the Shivamogga City Corporation, challenged an order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenges to Cancellation of Non-Creamy Layer Certificates. Petitioners Contend Income from Salary of Group C Employees Should Be Excluded Under Office Memoranda of Central Government.

3 Oct 2016

The matter concerned two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders withdrawing Non-Creamy Layer certifica...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)