Search Results for "Gram Sevak"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Gram Sevak"

73 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. Challenging Property Tax Levy by Gram Panchayat. Held that property tax is leviable on industrial land within Gram Panchayat limits under Section 124 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, and the revision application under Section 124(6) was not maintainable.

31 Jan 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd., a company manufacturing automobiles, challenged the property tax demands issued by the Gram Panchayat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Member Challenging Disqualification as Gram Rojgar Sevak. Post of Gram Rojgar Sevak under MGNREGA is not an office of profit under Section 14(1)(f) or (g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

30 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Santosh Jagannath Galbe, was an elected member of the Village Panchayat, Devegaon, Parbhani, and also worked as a Gram Rojgar Sevak un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Government Officer in Multiple FIRs for Alleged Offences Under SC/ST Act and IPC — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Absence of Prima Facie Case. The court held that the acts were in discharge of official duty and sanction was mandatory, and the allegations under the SC/ST Act did not constitute a prima facie case.

10 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Mukesh Krishna Bhoge, a government servant working as a Probationary Deputy Collector and Tahsildar at Mukhed, was involved in multipl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Third Child After Cutoff Date Under Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Petitioner disqualified under Section 14(j)(1) for giving birth to third child after the cutoff date of 5.9.2010, despite claiming the child was born before the election.

21 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Sau. Meerabai w/o Suresh Bhill, contested the election for the Gram Panchayat of Sawkheda on 5.9.2010 on a seat reserved for Scheduled...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Gram Panchayat Election Due to Non-Compliance with Toilet Requirement Under Section 14(1)(j-5) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The Court held that the Returning Officer must give an opportunity to the candidate to explain or produce documents before rejecting nomination.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Sushila Sukram Naik, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the rejection of her nominat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — No Evidence of Wilful Omission Causing Loss to Gram Panchayat. Disqualification set aside as Collector failed to record finding of loss and appellate authority dismissed appeal without considering merits.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Savita Devidas Adhane, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Viramgaon. On 04.08.2018, the District Collector, Aurangabad, disqualifi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Dissolution of Gram Panchayat Under Section 145(1A) of Maharashtra Gram Panchayat Act, 1958 — Resignations of Members Not Voluntary Due to Coercion. The court held that the Divisional Commissioner failed to verify voluntariness of resignations before dissolving the Gram Panchayat, and the dissolution order was set aside.

9 Jul 2015

The petitioners, Sau. Jyoti Purushhottam Tembhurne (Sarpanch) and Shri Dinesh Hanuman Tembhurne (member), challenged the order dated 22-4-2014 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder in Village Political Rivalry Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC confirmed based on credible eyewitness testimony and motive.

20 Dec 2017

The appellant, Chandansing s/o Dhannasing Patre, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the offence punishable under Section 302 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Villages in Scheduled Areas Under Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003. Court holds that the State Government's notification including villages in scheduled areas is valid and not subject to challenge in writ petitions.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats and individuals challenging the inclusion of their villages in scheduled areas unde...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)