Search Results for "Gram Panchayat employee"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Member Challenging Disqualification as Gram Rojgar Sevak. Post of Gram Rojgar Sevak under MGNREGA is not an office of profit under Section 14(1)(f) or (g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Santosh Jagannath Galbe, was an elected member of the Village Panchayat, Devegaon, Parbhani, and also worked as a Gram Rojgar Sevak un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 — Rent Agreement with Husband Constitutes Indirect Interest in Contract.

The petitioner, Sou. Gita Vijay Somankar, a member of Gram Panchayat Yeoli, was disqualified by the Collector, Gadchiroli and the Additional Commissio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Absorption of Grampanchayat Employees as Clerks in Municipal Corporation — Directions Issued for Regularisation of Service. Employees of merged Grampanchayats entitled to absorption in Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation with continuity of service and pay protection.

The petitioners were employees of Grampanchayats Taroda (Kh.) and Taroda (Bk.), which were merged into the Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Disqualification of Sarpanch. Teacher in Aided School Not a Government Servant Under Section 14(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Shivaji Manohar Kale, was elected as a member and later as Sarpanch of Asegaon Gram Panchayat. Respondent No. 4 filed a complaint alle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Gram Panchayat Employee Challenging Dismissal for Indecent Behaviour. Termination Order Upheld as Gram Panchayat Had Power to Dismiss Under Section 61(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Procedure of Natural Justice Was Followed.

The petitioner, Ashok Govindrao Sardar, was appointed as a Water Supply employee of Gram Panchayat Pimpalkhuta on 31 January 1986. On 12 December 2012...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Tracer's Petition Challenging Compulsory Retirement for Misappropriation of Cement Stock. Enquiry Findings Not Perverse and No Bias; Punishment Upheld Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The case involved a writ petition filed by a tracer employed at Panchayat Samiti, Chimur, challenging the disciplinary action of compulsory retirement...