Search Results for "Geeta Mehrotra"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Compromise — Criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC quashed as continuation would be an abuse of process of law.

The applicants, who are the husband and in-laws of respondent No. 2 (the wife), filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Domestic Violence Case Following Compromise Between Husband and Wife. Parties settled their disputes amicably and the wife expressed no objection to quashing of FIR under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who are the husband (Narayan Devkar) and his relatives, filed a Criminal Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proced...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Husband and Family Members in Dowry Harassment Case Filed as Counter-Blast to Civil Suits. Vague and Bald Allegations Against Family Including Elderly Grandmother Deemed Abuse of Process Under Section 482 CrPC.

The marriage between the first petitioner (husband) and the second respondent (wife) took place on 24-10-2020. The relationship turned sour within wee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020162622021_1

The matter arises from a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by four petitioners seeking quashing of pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Discharge of Accused In-Laws in Dowry Harassment Case. Vague Allegations Without Specific Incriminating Material Deemed Insufficient to Proceed to Trial, Resulting in Discharge of Relatives of Husband in Matrimonial Offence Case.

The petitioners, being the father-in-law, mother-in-law, and one brother-in-law of the complainant, challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Ju...