Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Compromise — Criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC quashed as continuation would be an abuse of process of law.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 37
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, who are the husband and in-laws of respondent No. 2 (the wife), filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 101/2021 registered at Police Station Murum, District Osmanabad for offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and the consequent charge-sheet and proceedings in RCC No. 155/2021 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Omerga. The marriage between applicant No. 4 (husband) and respondent No. 2 took place on 13.12.2009, and they have two daughters. The wife alleged that from 2013 onwards, the applicants demanded money and subjected her to cruelty, including demands for Rs. 2 lakhs for purchasing a television and cot, insults for not giving birth to a male child, and physical and mental ill-treatment. She was driven out of the matrimonial home. On 09.05.2021, some applicants allegedly came to her parents' house demanding custody of the daughters. During the pendency of the application, the parties arrived at a compromise. The wife filed an affidavit stating that the matter was amicably settled and she had no objection to the quashing of the FIR. The court, considering the nature of the dispute as matrimonial and the fact that the parties had settled their differences, held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. The court allowed the application and quashed the FIR, charge-sheet, and all proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Compromise in Non-Compoundable Offences - Matrimonial dispute where parties settled differences and wife expressed no objection to quashing - Held that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law, hence FIR and charge-sheet quashed (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and subsequent proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC on the basis of a compromise between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. FIR No. 101/2021 registered with Police Station Murum, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad, charge-sheet No. 69/2021, and proceedings in RCC No. 155/2021 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Omerga, are quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
  • Compromise in non-compoundable offences
  • Matrimonial disputes
  • Section 498-A IPC
  • Section 323 IPC
  • Section 504 IPC
  • Section 506 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (09) 28

Criminal Application No. 1546 of 2021

2022-09-06

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Rajesh S. Patil

Mr. Jayant R. Patil, Mr. S.J. Salgare, Mr. P.V. Barde

Nirmalabai W/o. Sambappa Mahajan and others

The State of Maharashtra and Sow. Priya W/o. Vikas Mahajan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR and charge-sheet in a matrimonial dispute involving allegations of dowry harassment and cruelty.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 101/2021, charge-sheet No. 69/2021, and proceedings in RCC No. 155/2021.

Filing Reason

The applicants (husband and in-laws) sought quashing of criminal proceedings initiated by the wife (respondent No. 2) alleging offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC.

Issues

Whether the FIR and subsequent proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC on the basis of a compromise between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicants argued that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the wife has no objection to quashing. The wife filed an affidavit supporting the compromise.

Ratio Decidendi

In matrimonial disputes where parties have settled their differences and the wife has no objection, continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicants who are original accused are praying for quashing of FIR No. 101/2021... The respondent No. 2 has lodged FIR... It is further stated that on 09.05.2021 at about 7 a.m., applicant Nos. 2 to 5, 7 and 9 came to her parent’s house and demanded custody of daughters...

Procedural History

The applicants filed Criminal Application No. 1546 of 2021 under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashing of FIR No. 101/2021, charge-sheet No. 69/2021, and RCC No. 155/2021. During pendency, parties compromised and the wife filed an affidavit. The court heard the application and allowed it on 06.09.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Petition Challenging Condition of Deposit in NI Act Appeal Suspension — Reduces 20% Compensation Deposit to 10% for Petitioners in Cheque Dishonour Case. The court held that the appellate court's discretion under Sec...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Labour Court Reference and Upholds Employer in Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Jurisdictional Challenge. Section 33(C)(2) Cannot Be Used to Adjudicate Disputed Industrial Claims; Proper Forum Is Reference Under Section 10.