Search Results for "Franchise agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Franchise agreement"

39 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining BCCI from Terminating IPL Franchise Agreement with Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited. Court Holds Termination Notice Invalid for Not Providing 30-Day Cure Period Under Clause 11.1 of Franchise Agreement.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Franchise Dispute — Upholds Award on Refund of Security Deposit and Interest but Sets Aside Award on Loss of Profit and Other Claims. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and damages were perverse and contrary to terms of franchise agreement.

14 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Kuoni Travels (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Franchisee in IPL Termination Dispute. Court restrains BCCI from terminating franchise agreement and issuing fresh tender pending arbitration, holding that prima facie case and balance of convenience favor the franchisee.

18 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (DCHL), was the successful bidder for the Hyderabad franchise of the Indian Premier League (IPL) and en...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Franchise Dispute Over Confidentiality and Copyright Infringement. The court restrained the defendant from breaching confidentiality, making false statements, and infringing copyright under the Franchisee Agreement.

3 Feb 2005

The plaintiffs, Villa Moda General Trading Co. W.L.L. and another, filed a suit against Chordia Fashions Pvt. Ltd. seeking various injunctions arising...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Shareholder Dispute — Restrains EGM and Share Transfers. Serious questions arise regarding validity of share transfers and removal of directors under Companies Act, 2013, warranting preservation of status quo.

14 Mar 2025

The present interim application arises out of a commercial suit filed by Desai Hospitals Ventures LLP and another (plaintiffs) against DHI Global Hold...

Supreme Court

"A Case Examining Limitation and Arbitration in Franchise Disputes."

1 Mar 2024

The Supreme Court ruled on the issue of whether the arbitration petition filed by Arif Azim Co. Ltd. was barred by limitation under Article 137 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Franchisee in EuroKids Trademark Dispute — Franchise Agreement Terminated Due to Non-Payment of Royalty and Breach of Terms. Court Restrains Respondent from Using Petitioner's Trademarks and Operating as Franchisee Pending Arbitration.

1 Jul 2015

The petitioner, EuroKids International Private Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors of Hindustan Lever Limited not liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as complaint failed to aver that they were in charge of and responsible for conduct of business at the time of offence.

10 Oct 2019

The petitioners, who were directors of Hindustan Lever Limited, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a criminal complaint filed by the respondent...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BCCI's Section 9 Petition for Enhanced Bank Guarantee in IPL Franchise Dispute. Court holds that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be used to modify or enhance security already ordered by consent, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any new circumstances warranting additional protection.

24 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking a...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)