WRIT PETITION NO. 2452 OF 2010
7 May 2010These writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged Regulation 15 of the Education Regulations 91 of the Pharmacy Cou...
Search Results for "First Class"
32099 result(s) found
Found 32099 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.
4 Dec 2017The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...
- 62
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.
1 Aug 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...
- 491
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Sub-Classification Within Scheduled Castes for Reservation in Punjab Act. State can provide preferential treatment to more backward castes without tinkering with Presidential List under Article 341.
27 Aug 2020The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) ...
- 357
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, Adjudicates Bunch of Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal Order on Seniority in Maharashtra Development Service Cadre. Dispute Pertains to Interpretation of Recruitment Quota Rules under Maharashtra Development Service (Constitution, Classification and Recruitment) Rules, 1973, and Whether Promotions Exceeding Quota Are Fortuitous.
21 Mar 2012The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard a bunch of writ petitions arising from a common order of the Maharashtra Administra...
- 12
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.
15 Jun 2026The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...
- 58
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.
6 Jan 2022The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...
- 163
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Will in Testamentary Suit and Examines Constitutional Validity of Hindu Succession Act Provisions. The Court Found the Handwritten Will Validly Executed and Considered Whether Sections 8 and 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Discriminate on Grounds of Gender in Succession Matters.
6 Nov 2012The judgment involved two testamentary suits before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. In Testamentary Suit No. 48 of 2005, the plaintiff claimed...
- 23
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.
1 Aug 2026Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...
- 66
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) of Income Tax Act and Rule 3(7)(i) of Income Tax Rules in Bank Employee Loan Perquisite Case. Delegation of Power to Prescribe Fringe Benefits Held Not Excessive and Use of SBI Prime Lending Rate as Benchmark Upheld as Non-Arbitrary.
7 May 2024The Supreme Court, in a common judgment, dismissed appeals filed by staff unions and officers' associations of various banks challenging the constitut...
- 426
