Search Results for "Extended Period of Limitation"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wilful Suppression.

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in floriculture, and the Commis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exemption Under Notification No.223/88.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Rajkumar Forge Limited and its director challenging orders of the Commissioner of Central...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal in Classification Dispute. Tribunal's finding that catalyst is distinct from consumable upheld; extended limitation period not applicable without willful mis-declaration.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (Export) against Reliance Industries Limited. The dispute centered on the classification of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. CESTAT's finding that activity was classifiable under Works Contract Service rather than Erection Commissioning and Installation Service upheld.

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Finance Act, 1994 agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Central Excise Appeal on Service Tax Liability for Veterinary and Testing Services. Assessee Claims Exemption Under Notification No. 13/2003-ST for Commission Agent Services, While Revenue Alleges Taxable Business Auxiliary Services.

The appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 35G of the Central Exci...