Search Results for "Due Diligence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Due Diligence"

731 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 731 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Chamber Summons to Strike Out Affidavit of Evidence in Specific Performance Suit — Affidavit of Evidence Not a Pleading Under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC. Court Holds That Averments Not in Written Statement May Be Allowed If They Do Not Introduce a New Case or Cause Prejudice.

20 Mar 2013

The Plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of a contract based on an unsigned MOU. The Defendant filed a written statement after a delay of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Additional Evidence in Appeal Against Order Refusing Revocation of Administrator. Order XLI Rule 27 CPC requires strict proof of due diligence for admitting additional evidence at appellate stage.

27 Sep 2012

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant) under Order XLI, Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Civil Suit — Due Diligence Test Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Not Applicable Before Commencement of Trial. Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Amendment Application on Ground of Lack of Due Diligence When Trial Had Not Commenced.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioners, plaintiffs in a civil suit (O.S. No. 188/2015) pending before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Hungund, filed an application (IA ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order Allowing Amendment of Appeal Memorandum. Amendment Sought to Clarify Resignation Documents as Notice and Resignation Letter Was Held Permissible Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Despite Being Filed After Conclusion of Final Arguments, as It Was Clarificatory and Not Prejudicial.

6 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from an appeal filed by a teacher challenging his resignation and seeking reinstatement under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation in Property Dispute Over Incomplete Building. Plaintiff's claim for declaration of ownership and injunction held time-barred under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 as cause of action arose in 1969 when assignment deed was executed.

20 Jan 2006

The plaintiff, M/s. Foreshore Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a suit in 1999 seeking a declaration that it is the owner of the entire suit la...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Civil Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Pleadings Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The court set aside the trial court's rejection of the defendants' amendment application, holding that the explanation of reliance on counsel's opinion constituted due diligence and the amendment was necessary to decide the real controversy.

11 Apr 2014

The petitioners, original defendants in Regular Civil Suit No. 20/2010/A, filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

25 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Interference with Concurrent Findings of Fact and Law. Court held that the scope of interference under Article 227 is limited to jurisdictional errors and not reappreciation of evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, M/s. Sai Shradha Developers and its partners, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Written Statement in Specific Performance Suit. Mistake of Counsel Held Not to Prejudice Defendant's Right to Fair Trial — Amendment Allowed as Explanatory and Necessary for Real Controversy.

18 Feb 2014

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of contract dated 02.03.2003 against the respondents. During the trial, af...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Amendment Sought at Final Stage Allowed to Avoid Multiplicity of Litigation. The court held that Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC permits impleadment of necessary parties at any stage to effectuate complete adjudication and avoid multiplicity.

23 Sep 2014

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration and injunction contending that a sale deed executed in favor of deceased Vijay Josh...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)