Search Results for "Drugs and Cosmetics Rules"

69 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Customs Appeal, Upholds Confiscation of Cosmetics Imported Through Non-Notified Port. Import of Cosmetics Through Marmagoa Port Violates Rule 133 Read with Rule 43-A of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as Cosmetics Are Not Exempted Under Rule 132 and Schedule D.

The Commissioner of Customs, Goa, filed an appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Mehandi Manufacturer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Sanction order found to be cyclostyled proforma without application of mind, rendering prosecution invalid.

The applicants, Chutararam and Jetharam Gehlot, were the proprietors of 'Prem Mehandi Center', a small manufacturer of henna/mehandi powder and cone p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Pharmaceutical Company and Directors in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Sample Not Drawn in Accordance with Rules. Failure to Follow Sampling Procedure Under Rule 46 of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The petitioners, M/s Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd (a drug manufacturing company) and its Managing Director and Director, filed a petition under Section ...