Search Results for "Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge by Drug Supplier Against Blacklisting Order Alleging Non-Compliance with Rule 26A of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Rules, 2000. Petitioner Assails Blacklisting as Ultra Vires in Absence of Corrupt Practice Finding and Procedural Violation.

The petitioner, a pharmaceutical company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer in NSQ Case Due to Prejudicial Delay in Testing. Delay of 20 Months in Analysis of Drug Sample Violated Right to Challenge Government Analyst's Report Under Section 25(3) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by M/s Zim Laboratories Ltd. and its officers (the manufact...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010211662021_1

Background: The case involves multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FDA Orders Stopping Production of Johnson's Baby Powder Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Orders passed without providing test reports or hearing the manufacturer were set aside as arbitrary and in breach of principles of audi alteram partem.

The petitioner, Johnson & Johnson Pvt Ltd, a manufacturer of pharmaceuticals and cosmetics including 'Johnsons Baby Powder', challenged three orders p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Customs Appeal, Upholds Confiscation of Cosmetics Imported Through Non-Notified Port. Import of Cosmetics Through Marmagoa Port Violates Rule 133 Read with Rule 43-A of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as Cosmetics Are Not Exempted Under Rule 132 and Schedule D.

The Commissioner of Customs, Goa, filed an appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Public Interest Litigation on Unregulated Stem Cell Therapies for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Court Examines Legality Under Drugs Act and Lays Down Permissibility of Such Therapies in Clinical Trial Settings Only.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Yash Charitable Trust and others before the Supreme Court, raising concerns about the rampant promotion a...