Search Results for "Dishonour of Cheque"

Trending :

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint ...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonoured Cheque Case Under Negotiable Instrume...
Supreme Court Quashes Summoning Order Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case ...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pension Rules Case Regarding Withholding of Gr...
Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Meritorious Reserved Candidate to Unreserve...

Search Results for "Dishonour of Cheque"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash Cheque Dishonour Proceedings - Complaint Filed by Special Power of Attorney Holder Upheld as Maintainable Despite Omission of Awareness Averment. Court Held That Since Special Power of Attorney Holder Was Signatory to Underlying Sale Deed Transaction, Omission Was Not Fatal, and Pendency of Civil Suit for Recovery Does Not Bar Criminal Prosecution Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

13 Mar 2026

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed by the petitioners, who were accused in a cheque dishonour case, seeking to q...

High Court

High Court Quashes Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to External Account Freeze. Dishonour Attributable to Police Investigation Freeze Order, Not Insufficiency of Funds Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Rendering Proceedings Unsustainable.

4 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a criminal petition filed by Petitioners and its directors seeking to quash proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Ins...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Court's Orders Allowing Document Production Under Section 391 CrPC in Cheque Dishonor Appeal -- No Prejudice Found in Permitting Additional Evidence for Defense

25 Feb 2026

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition challenging two orders of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar that allowed the accused to produce ...

High Court

High Court partly allowed Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case -- Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Upheld However order for imposition of cost set aside -- Petitioner Challenge to Conviction and Sentence Fails

27 Jan 2026

The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act -- The petitioner was con...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case, Modifies Sentence to Fine. Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Favours Complainant Unless Rebutted by Probable Defence – High Court’s Acquittal Overturned

2 Apr 2025

Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt (Sections 118 & 139 NI Act): The Supreme Court reiterated that once the complainant proves the cheque...

Supreme Court

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Section 138 – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Section 14, Section 17 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 – Moratorium under IBC bars proceedings against a corporate debtor but not against a natural person – Cause of action under Section 138 of NI Act arises after the issuance of demand notice – High Court erred in relying on P. Mohan Raj – Appellant’s petition under Section 482 CrPC ought to have been allowed – Complaint and summoning order quashed.

17 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court distinguished the case from P. Mohan Raj, holding that the cause of action under Section 138 NI Act arose after the moratorium was i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

6 Mar 2025

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

Supreme Court

Dishonour of Cheques — Security Deposit — Refund Conditional Upon Vacant Possession — Conviction Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Set Aside

4 Mar 2025

The refund of security deposit was contingent on the respondent handing over vacant possession of the flat. The appellant was entitled to deduct unpa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarified the Scope of Interim Moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Held That Regulatory Penalties Imposed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Are Not Covered

4 Mar 2025

Invoking Insolvency Proceedings Cannot stay execution of Penalty Orders for Consumer Protection Law Violations – The Apex Court Upheld the NCDRC’s...

Supreme Court

Non-executive director cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, without specific allegations of active involvement.

13 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the Appellant. – Held that vicarious liability under Section 141 NI Act requires specific...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)