Search Results for "Differential Duty"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Quashes Decades-Old Show Cause Notice: Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied" "Excessive delay in adjudication renders the process violative of natural justice, says the Court."

The Bombay High Court quashed a 21-year-old adjudication process initiated by a show cause notice (SCN) issued in 2003 against M/s Esjaypee Impex Pvt....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Chewing Tobacco Packaging Valuation Under Central Excise Act. The Court affirms that HDPE bags sold by the respondent-assessee qualify as wholesale packages, exempting them from retail sale valuation under Section 4A of the Excise Act.

The appeals challenge the judgment dated 7th November 2008 by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, addressing whether the goods so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Penalty Imposition under FT Act: Rehabilitation Scheme's Scope Examined Interpreting Section 11(2) and SICA Provisions

Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Imposition of penalty for non-fulfillment of export obligation under an Export Promotion Capita...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant's Appeal Against High Court's Jurisdiction Finding in GST Notification Challenge. High Court of Sikkim Lacked Territorial Jurisdiction as Cause of Action for Challenging Goa's GST Notification Arose in Goa, Not Sikkim, Under Article 226(2) of the Constitution.

The dispute originated from writ petitions filed before the High Court of Sikkim by a private limited company engaged in the lottery ticket business, ...