Search Results for "Dangerous weapon"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Dangerous weapon"

299 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 299 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal in Murder Conviction Under Sections 302/34 and 120-B IPC - Conviction upheld based on complete chain of circumstantial evidence and reliable eye-witness testimony. Appellant's guilt established through last seen theory, recovery of weapon, and conduct, with no interference warranted in trial court's judgment.

16 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 27.09.2018 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, in Sessions Trial No. 35 of 2016, convicting the appellant ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Assault Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Civil Nature of Dispute. FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, 427, 504, 506 IPC quashed as allegations were vague and the dispute was civil.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioners, C. Ganesh Narayan and Vidya Nataraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Non-Applicability of Section 397 IPC. The Court held that Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, applies only to the offender who uses a deadly weapon, and the benefit of acquittal of a co-accused extends to other accused when allegations are indivisible, leading to acquittal based on unreliable identification and suspicious FIR.

29 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by two appellants, Ganesan and Shanmugam, challenging their conviction under Section 397 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Support Apprehension of Bail. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application; Detaining Authority's Satisfaction of Imminent Release Held Unsubstantiated.

14 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Sagar Sunil Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 27 September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of 'Public Order' Impact — Definition of 'Dangerous Weapon' Held Unconstitutionally Vague. The court held that mere possession of a weapon without evidence of public disturbance cannot justify preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

11 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Iqbal Munnaf Sayyed, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA) by an orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Verify Secret Statements Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid, Making Detention Order Unsustainable.

3 Mar 2016

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Dipak alias D. Baba Kashinath Kamble, challenged a detention order dated 7 August 2015 issued by the Commissione...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Verification of Incamera Statements. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Petitioner's Bail Status and Failed to Verify Incamera Statements.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Jay @ Nunya Rajesh Bhosale, challenged a detention order dated 19.5.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3(2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind to Witness Statements. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider in-camera statements, violating the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

14 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Ravi Hanumant Thorat, brother-in-law of the detenu Sahadeo @ Sada Laxman Dhavare, challenged the validity of a preventive detention or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused of Murder, Convicts for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder and Hurt by Dangerous Weapons — Single blow on head during land dispute not intended to cause death, conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside.

25 Mar 2011

The appellant, Shrawan Dagdu Pawar, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Ravindra alias Bhausaheb Shridhar Dhumal under Section 302 I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Sessions Court, Latur, convicting multiple accused persons for offences under Se...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)