Search Results for "Dangerous Buildings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Dangerous Buildings"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

14 Mar 2014

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

5 Dec 2015

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Building Declared Dilapidated — Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Procedure Under MMC Act Before Demolition. Tenants' Right to Hearing Upheld Under Sections 354 and 488 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

16 Oct 2014

The petitioners, eleven tenants residing in a building called Habib Terrace in Kurla, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Eviction Notice Against Residents and Shop Occupants in Municipal Corporation Dispute — Structural Audit Reports Not Considered Before Declaring Building Dangerous. Court holds that Municipal Corporation must consider structural audit reports submitted by occupants before classifying a building as C-1 (dangerous) under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

10 Mar 2017

The petitioners, residents and shop occupants of a building known as 'Velbai Velji Arogya Bhuvan' in Sion, Mumbai, challenged an eviction notice dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement/MoU and Deed of Assignment Due to Lack of Privity of Contract and Non-Compliance with Stamp Act. The court held that a third party cannot enforce a contract to which it is not a party, and that unregistered and insufficiently stamped documents cannot be admitted in evidence.

6 May 2016

The plaintiff, Excel Enterprises, a partnership firm, filed a suit seeking a declaration that there is a valid and binding Agreement/MoU dated 28th Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Irani Chawl Structures as Unauthorized Construction. Court upholds demolition by Municipal Corporation under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, finding no violation of natural justice as notice was affixed and opportunity of hearing was given.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, residents of Irani Chawl, Prabhadevi, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their structures by the Municipal C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. Court upholds demolition of structures built without valid permission under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, holding that no prior notice is required when construction is patently illegal.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, AM Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of certain structures by the Municipal Corporation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)