Search Results for "DEPB"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "DEPB"

18 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 80-IB for Duty Drawback and DEPB Receipts. Court Held That Duty Drawback and DEPB Receipts Are Profits Derived From Business Under Section 80-IB of Income Tax Act, 1961, as They Reimburse Manufacturing and Exporting Costs, Following Meghalaya Steels Limited and Topman Exports Precedents.

10 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by an assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting wooden handicraft items, against ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessees' Appeals in Customs Duty Cases Involving Forged DEPB Scrips. Court upheld duty liability as forged scrips are void ab initio under the Customs Act, 1962, justifying extended limitation period due to fraud, with penalty proceedings remanded for adjudication.

23 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals concerning customs duty evasion cases where appellants had imported goods using forged DEPB (Duty E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeals in DEPB Overvaluation Case — Finds No Evidence of Overvaluation or Fraud. Revenue's reliance on market enquiry and statements of third parties insufficient to prove that exported automobile parts were overvalued for DEPB benefits under Customs Act, 1962.

13 Apr 2015

The appellant, M/s Advance Netways Marketing Pvt. Ltd., was an exporter of automobile parts such as door bidding, fuel pump fitting, front suspension ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

24 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.

21 Mar 2005

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Joshy Mathew, challenged the detention order dated 3rd May 2004 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act Despite Retrospective Amendment After Assessment Order. Commissioner Must Consider Retrospective Amendment as Law Deemed to Exist on Date of Assessment Order.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Kalpesh M. Nagda, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2003-2004 on 25 November 2003, declaring total income of Rs.48,22,312...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FEMA Violations in Bogus Export Case — Appellant Director Held Liable for Receiving Remittances Without Actual Exports Under Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA.

28 Mar 2012

The case involves an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging DGFT Communication on Duty Free Replenishment Certificates — SION Applicable as on Date of Export. The court quashed orders demanding duty and penalty for imports under DFRC based on subsequent SION, holding that the exporter's entitlement is determined by norms in force at the time of export.

3 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Piramal Glass Limited (formerly Gujarat Glass Limited), a manufacturer, challenged a communication dated 03/05/2010 from the Director ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of ARE-1 Forms as Proof of Export Under Advance Authorisation Scheme. Court Holds That ARE-1 Forms Are Valid Proof of Export Under Paragraph 4.25 of Handbook of Procedures 2009-14 and Quashes Show Cause Notice.

12 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, challenged a Letter dated 1-12-2016 and a Show C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prohibitory Order Under Regulation 21 of CHALR, 2004 — No Appeal Lies to CESTAT. Regulation 22(8) of CHALR, 2004 is Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.

5 Apr 2013

The appeal arises from a decision of the CESTAT dated 2 January 2013, which held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order passed under Regu...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)