Search Results for "DCPR 2034"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Dispute over Transferable Development Rights and Incentive Benefits under Development Control Regulations.

The case involves Bholenath Developers Ltd. challenging the denial of additional Transferable Development Rights (TDR) benefits by the Municipal Corpo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment.

The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Demolition Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' structure demolished without notice under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and court orders restoration.

The petitioners, occupiers of a plot of land in Jogeshwari, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 15 June 2023 passed by the Executive Engineer of the Bri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Tenants Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Building. Tenants' objections under DCPR 2034 rejected as redevelopment was approved by majority and TAC.

The Bombay High Court dismissed seven writ petitions filed by tenants of a building named 'Haji Manzil' located in Bandra, Mumbai. The building, const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging SEIAA's Deferral of Environmental Clearance Based on NGT Judgment. SEIAA Must Independently Apply Mind to Each Proposal and Cannot Mechanically Defer Decisions Due to NGT's Order on Recreational Ground.

The Petitioner No.1, NAREDCO West Foundation, is the Maharashtra chapter of the National Real Estate Development Council, representing over 400 real e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Construction in Property Dispute Among Family Members. Alleged Breach of Development Agreement and Illegal Construction on Common Property Leads to Status Quo Order.

The dispute arises out of a family arrangement among the Motwane family members regarding a larger property at Khar, Mumbai. On 31st March, 1990, the ...