Search Results for "Cryptic Order"

421 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 421 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Bail Order in Murder Case Due to Lack of Reasoning. Bail granted under Section 439 CrPC quashed as order was cryptic and failed to consider gravity of offence under Section 302 IPC, with matter remanded for fresh decision.

The appeal was preferred by the informant-appellant, the son of the deceased, challenging the High Court of Rajasthan's order dated 7th May 2020 grant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by High Court in Murder Case Due to Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Consider Criminal Antecedents. The High Court's orders granting bail were cryptic and did not consider the gravity of the offence or the criminal antecedents of the accused.

The appeals were filed by the informant-appellant, the mother of the deceased Rupesh Kumar, challenging the orders dated 22.07.2021 and 13.09.2021 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Directing Preservation of CDR/SDR Records in Corruption Case — Application Lacked Specific Grounds and Was Aimed at Exerting Pressure on Investigating Officer.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Police Inspector of ACB, Aurangabad, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Bocoum Ibrahim Malienne, a Nigerian national, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, Greater Mumbai in NDPS Special Case No. 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No substantial question of law arose as the appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit land.

The appellant, Bajirao Ramchandra Shelar, filed two second appeals (Second Appeal No.494 of 1990 and Second Appeal No.495 of 1990) against the judgmen...