Search Results for "Cross-Appeal"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Case, Upholds 50:50 Contributory Negligence Apportionment. Both ST Bus and Truck Drivers Found Negligent Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 12.01.2007 when an ST bus (GJ-18-V-8903) driven rashly rammed into a stationary truck (GJ-7-X-6523) parked wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Appellate Court Erred in Modifying Decree Without Cross-Appeal. Order of Refund of Earnest Money Restored as Appellate Court Could Not Set Aside Relief Granted to Plaintiff in Absence of Cross-Objection Under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC.

The appellant, Ghodganga Sakhar Karkhana, a registered cooperative society, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 12 August 1991...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reduces Compensation from Rs.6,00,000 to Rs.1,50,000 per Hectare. Amendment of Claim Allowed but Compensation Based on Comparable Sale Deed of Similar Agricultural Land.

The case pertains to the acquisition of 5 Hectares of agricultural land belonging to the claimant, Namdeo s/o Champat Kshirsagar, situated on the outs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses. Execution of Agreement Not Duly Proved Under Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, as Attesting Witnesses Were Not Examined.

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 01.06.2005 filed by the respondent-plaintiff (Ashish Jain) against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, Insurance Company Liable to Pay. Deceased was a 42-year-old businessman earning Rs. 15,000 per month; Tribunal's assessment of income and multiplier upheld.

The appeal was filed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhoom, in M.A.C.P. No.7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Multiplier applied as per age of deceased, not claimant, under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of Prakash Potdar, who died in a vehicular accident. The decea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Parents of Deceased Engineering Student in Motor Accident Claim. Notional Income Increased to Rs.8,000/- per Month with 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 18 Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Shiva @ Ankush Talokar, filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the com...