Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tractor with Trailer Carrying Bricks Held to Be Goods Vehicle, Insurer Liable. The court held that the insurance policy covering third party risks extends to the use of the tractor as a goods vehicle, and the insurer cannot avoid liability merely because additional premium for goods carriage was not paid.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased Balaji died in a collision between his motorcycle and a tractor with a trailer carrying bricks. The claimants, including the widow, minor children, and mother of the deceased, sought compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur, awarded Rs. 5,96,000 with interest at 7.5% p.a. The insurance company appealed, arguing that the tractor was insured as an agricultural vehicle and not as a goods vehicle, and thus the additional premium for goods carriage was not paid, making the insurer not liable. The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the appeal. The court held that the tractor with a trailer used for carrying bricks falls within the definition of 'goods vehicle' under Section 2(14) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. However, the insurance policy covered third party risks, and the use as a goods vehicle did not increase the risk so as to avoid liability. The court relied on the principle that the insurer is liable for third party risks even if the vehicle is used for a purpose not specified in the policy, unless the policy expressly excludes such use. The court also noted that the tractor was inherently capable of being used with a trailer, and the accident occurred due to the negligence of the tractor driver. The quantum of compensation was not challenged on merits, and the court found no reason to interfere. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Insurance Liability - Goods Vehicle - Tractor with Trailer - The issue was whether the insurance company is liable when a tractor insured as an agricultural vehicle is used with a trailer to carry bricks, constituting a 'goods vehicle' under Section 2(14) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that the tractor with trailer was a goods vehicle and the insurer was liable as the policy covered third party risks, and the use as a goods vehicle did not fundamentally alter the risk so as to avoid liability. (Paras 1-10)

B) Motor Vehicles Act - Section 147 - Third Party Risks - The court interpreted Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, holding that the insurance policy covering third party risks extends to the use of the vehicle as a goods vehicle, even if additional premium for goods carriage was not paid, as the tractor was inherently capable of being used with a trailer. (Paras 5-9)

C) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Quantum - The Tribunal awarded Rs. 5,96,000 with interest at 7.5% p.a. The court upheld the quantum, noting that the deceased was aged 30 years and the multiplier of 17 was correctly applied. (Para 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation when the offending tractor was used as a goods vehicle by attaching a trailer for carrying bricks, without payment of additional premium for goods carriage?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur in M.A.C.P. No. 379 of 2005 is confirmed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 147
  • Section 149
  • Section 2(14)
  • Section 2(47)
  • Goods Vehicle
  • Tractor
  • Trailer
  • Additional Premium
  • Third Party Risk
  • Insurance Liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (01) 21

First Appeal No. 3001 of 2009

2019-01-04

Sunil K. Kotwal

Mr. S. G. Chapalgaonkar for appellant, Mr. N. D. Kendre for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 & 6

New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Sunita W/o Balaji Pandit @ Potdar & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation in motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought to avoid liability for compensation on ground that tractor was used as goods vehicle without additional premium

Filing Reason

Insurance company challenged the Tribunal's award holding it liable to pay compensation

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur awarded Rs. 5,96,000 with interest at 7.5% p.a. in M.A.C.P. No. 379 of 2005

Issues

Whether the insurance company is liable when the tractor was used as a goods vehicle by attaching a trailer for carrying bricks, without payment of additional premium for goods carriage?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company): The tractor was insured as an agricultural vehicle, not as a goods vehicle. The use of the tractor with a trailer to carry bricks amounts to use as a goods vehicle, which requires additional premium. Since no additional premium was paid, the insurer is not liable. Respondents (Claimants): The insurance policy covers third party risks. The tractor with trailer is a goods vehicle, but the insurer is liable as the accident occurred due to the negligence of the tractor driver. The policy does not exclude such use.

Ratio Decidendi

A tractor with a trailer used for carrying bricks is a 'goods vehicle' under Section 2(14) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. However, the insurance policy covering third party risks extends to such use, and the insurer cannot avoid liability merely because additional premium for goods carriage was not paid, as the tractor was inherently capable of being used with a trailer and the risk was not fundamentally altered.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs. 5,96,000 inclusive of 'no fault liability' compensation, with interest thereon @ 7.5% p.a. from the date of the claim petition. The facts leading to institution of this appeal are that, on 21.06.2005 at about 7.30 p.m., when the deceased was proceeding from village Halgara towards village Sawari by his motorcycle along with his friend Satish, who was pillion rider, near the field of Shriniwas Jain, the offending Tractor came from opposite direction and gave dash to the motorcycle, resulting into death of the deceased Balaji.

Procedural History

The claimants filed M.A.C.P. No. 379 of 2005 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur, which awarded compensation. The insurance company, New India Assurance Company Ltd., appealed against the award in the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad, which dismissed the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 147, Section 149, Section 2(14), Section 2(47)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tractor with Trailer Carrying Bricks Held to Be Goods Vehicle, Insurer Liable. The court held that the insurance policy covering third party risks extends to the use o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Rules on Admissibility of Documents in Suit for Partition and Declaration of Rights. Documents not proved in accordance with Indian Evidence Act, 1872 cannot be admitted in evidence unless original is produced or foundation for seco...