Search Results for "Creditor Status"

297 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 297 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Over Creditor Status and Resolution Plan Approval. Statutory Authority's Claim as Financial or Secured Creditor Rejected Due to Lack of Diligent Action During Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The dispute arose from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of M/s. JNC Construction (P) Ltd, the Corporate Debtor. The appellant, a sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.

The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Lack of Financial Creditor Status. Interest-Free Term Loan Does Not Qualify as Financial Debt Under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as It Lacks Consideration for Time Value of Money.

The appeal arose under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against the dismissal by the National Company Law Appellate Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Limitation Dispute — Application Under Section 7 Held Barred by Limitation. Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets Does Not Extend Limitation for Initiating CIRP Under IBC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Babulal Vardharji Gurjar, a director of Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd., against the order of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Admission of Winding Up Petition Due to Bona Fide Counterclaim. Company's claim for damages exceeding admitted debt constitutes a substantial defence under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appellant, Prime Broking Company (India) Ltd., appealed against an order dated 28 June 2016 passed by the Company Judge admitting a winding up pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Admission of Winding Up Petition Due to Bona Fide Counterclaim. Company's claim for damages exceeding admitted debt constitutes a substantial defence under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appellant, Prime Broking Company (India) Ltd., appealed against an order dated 28 June 2016 passed by the Company Judge admitting a winding up pet...