Search Results for "Court Receiver report"

258 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 258 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Court Receiver in Property Dispute, Directs Parties to Pursue Claims Before DRT. Court holds that once a suit is transferred to DRT, the Court Receiver's role ceases and parties must seek remedies before the Tribunal.

This judgment concerns an application filed by the Court Receiver seeking discharge without passing accounts, subject to payment of costs, charges and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Appoint Court Receiver Under Section 17 of Arbitration Act. Court Receiver is an Officer of the High Court Subject Only to Chief Justice's Supervision.

The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay filed a Report seeking directions on whether the Registry should accept matters where an Arbitral Tribunal appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge Order in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Court Receiver Directed to Hand Over Possession to Plaintiff. Held that the Court Receiver's appointment was proper and the appeal lacked merit.

The appellants, who are partners of Crescent Builders, filed an appeal against an order of the learned Single Judge in Suit No.1512 of 2009. The Singl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Court Receiver's Report and Additional Report in Land Dispute — Directs Demarcation and Removal of Encroachments. Court upholds Receiver's authority to manage suit property and take steps to protect it from unauthorized development.

The case pertains to a long-standing dispute over land survey No.34/1 and 35/3 at Panchpakhadi, Thane. The appellants had challenged a trial court ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Eviction Decree in Favour of Court Receiver — Tenancy Rights Not Extinguished by Consent Terms. The Court held that the Court Receiver could not evict the defendants as trespassers without due process, as the consent terms did not terminate their tenancy rights.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 22nd February 2010 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court in S.C.Suit No.1154 of 2000, decreeing the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Both Challenges to Court Receiver's Royalty Fixation in Family Property Dispute. Court upholds Receiver's order fixing royalty at Rs. 1,50,000/- per month, finding no perversity or lack of material.

The dispute arises out of a family property and business conflict between the plaintiff, Majid Ahmedbhai Oomerbhoy, and the defendants, including Rash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment Before Judgment in Recovery Suit by Financial Institutions. Non-Compliance With Order 38 Rule 5A CPC Does Not Invalidate Order Absent Prejudice.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by financial institutions (respondents 2 to 12) against J.K. Synthetics Limited (appellant) for recovery of dues. ...