Search Results for "Courier Regulations"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Office Note Requiring Courier Companies' Authorized Signatories to Hold 'F' Card, 'G' Card or Kardex Number and Pass Examinations Under CHALR 2004. Courier Regulations Not Exempt from Customs Broker Licensing Requirements Under CHALR 2004/CBLR 2013.

The Couriers Association of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging an Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Over Compassionate Appointment Interpretation of Regulations and Judicial Precedent. A detailed analysis of a court case involving familial claims for compassionate appointment, government regulations and legal precedents.

A contentious issue of compassionate appointment based on familial lineage, juxtaposed against government regulations and judicial precedents. The pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Courier License in Gold Smuggling Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Suspension Order Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Allege Any Act or Omission by Petitioner Under Courier Regulations, 1998.

The petitioner, TNT India Private Limited, a private limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and a subsidiary of TNT Expres...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Airport Operator's Challenge to Customs Regulation Requiring Bill of Entry for Export Goods. Regulation 5(2) of Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 Held Intra Vires Customs Act, 1962 and Constitutional.

The petitioner, M/s. Mumbai International Airport Private Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Regulation 5(2) of the Handling o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Transfer of Employees Under EPF Act — Transfer of Employees to Subsidiary Not a 'Transfer of Establishment' Under Section 7A of EPF Act

The petitioner, Aviation Karmachari Sanghatana, a trade union representing employees of Pawan Hans Ltd. (respondent no.1), filed a writ petition chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Charge-sheet and Penalty Set Aside Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Disproportionate Punishment.

The petitioner, Abha Chawla Mohanty, was an employee of the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appointed in October 1985. She was served with a charge-sheet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal by Financial Creditor Against IRP Fee Claim in Insolvency Case — Professional Fee of IRP Approved by CoC Must Be Paid by Corporate Debtor.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Chief Manager of Canara Bank, the sole Financial Creditor of M/s S.V.K. Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. (Corporat...