Search Results for "Contract Interpretation"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court — Arbitration Award Upheld. Challenge Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Court Dismissed Petition — Upheld Arbitral Award Citing Commercial Common Sense and Non-Comparability of Data Points

The Bombay High Court upheld the arbitral award, dismissing the petition filed by the Union of India. The Court found the Arbitral Tribunal’s interp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Clause Rendered Ineffective After Sale Deed Execution, Rules Bombay High Court “Mere historical reference to an Agreement doesn’t sustain arbitration rights if the contract has ceased to exist.”

The case revolves around whether disputes arising out of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and related documents, which lacked a specific arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Review Petition in Supreme Court challenges the interpretation of contract clauses and seeks specific performance in a property transaction dispute.

This case pertains to the review petition filed by Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. challenging the Supreme Court’s previous judgment. The petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Battle Over Ganatra Hotels: Panchamias vs. Ganatra Group. Complex Dispute Involving Share Transfers, Valuation Discrepancies, and Legal Contentions Reaches Judicial Review

This case involves two connected Commercial Arbitration Petitions arising from an Arbitral Award dated 5th April 2016. The primary parties are the Pan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award in Contract Dispute Over Final Bill Claims. Court Held That Arbitrator's Consideration of Vitiating Factors and Contract Clauses Was Permissible Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Despite Prohibition on Further Claims in Clauses 65 and 65A.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 02.07.2001 for repair works, with time extended to 19.01.2002. The respondent contractor submitted a final bil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Specific Performance Suit by Reversing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Agreements and Memoranda of Understanding Interpreted Together as Supplementary, with Appellants Found Ready and Willing to Perform Contract Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from four suits filed by the Appellants for specific performance of agreements of sale dated 20.03.1991 and memoranda of understandi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute, Upholds Plausible Contract Interpretation. High Court Exceeded Section 37 Jurisdiction by Substituting Its Own Construction of Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement.

The dispute arose from a Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement (CMDA) executed on 16.07.2008 between Parsa Kente Collieries Limited (appellant) and Rajas...