Search Results for "Consumer Court"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Consumer Court"

1566 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1566 result(s)

Supreme Court

Complainant not required to prove service obtained for self-employment livelihood unless appellant proves commercial purpose.

10 May 2024

Consumer Protection - Maintainability of Complaint - Definition of Consumer - Service obtained for Commercial Purpose - Onus of Proof - Burden of Proo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Judgment Debtor's Petition Quashing Consumer Forum Proceedings Under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Lack of Notice of Readiness and Willingness by Decree-Holder Renders Penalty Proceedings Unmaintainable.

16 Aug 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Aditya Developers, a partnership firm, was the judgment debtor in a decree passed by the Consumer Forum on 17/01/2007. The decree...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Consumer Complaint Dismissed as Forum Lacked Territorial Jurisdiction and Complaint Was Filed Beyond Limitation Without Condonation Application.

12 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Heena Mohammeddin Kashmiri, filed a Consumer Complaint No. MSDF/198/2008 before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mumbai...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Consumer Forum Orders Against Company in Liquidation — Jurisdiction of Consumer Forum Barred After Appointment of Official Liquidator Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that once a winding up order is passed, the Company Court has exclusive jurisdiction over the company's assets, and the Consumer Forum cannot proceed without leave of the Company Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956.

29 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Sandhu, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking to quash orders dated 17.10.2006, ...

High Court

High Court of Madras Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Direction to National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for Alleged Statutory Violations; Grants Liberty to Approach Competent Forum. Court Holds that Proprietary Concern Availing Banking Services for Commercial Purpose Does Not Fall Within Definition of 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Hence Complaint Not Maintainable.

14 Feb 2025

The petitioner, V.R. Krishnakumar, a proprietor of Central Processor Global Inc. Slofter, maintained a current account with American Express Bank Limi...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal Against State Commission Order in Consumer Execution Proceedings — Compliance of Decree for Possession or Refund with Interest. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the execution applications for fresh adjudication, keeping all contentions open.

7 Aug 2025

The case involves an appeal by Kishore Bhardwaj, the complainant/decree holder, against a common order dated 11.09.2024 passed by the State Consumer D...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.

20 Mar 2025

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Consumer Forum Notice Against Restaurant Company for Lack of Consumer Relationship. Petitioner Company not a 'Consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as the respondent was not a consumer of its services.

27 Dec 2013

The petitioner, M/s Vasudeva Adiga's Fast Food Pvt Ltd, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, running vegetarian restaurants in Bangal...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Execution Appeals in Consumer Dispute Over Flat Possession — Directions Issued for Compliance Under Sections 25 and 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The decree holder is entitled to pursue both execution remedies simultaneously without being compelled to elect between them.

7 Aug 2025

The case involves execution appeals filed by the decree holder, Kishore Bhardwaj, against a common order dated 11.09.2024 of the State Consumer Disput...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to State Commission's Order Setting Aside Attachment in Consumer Dispute. Earlier writ petition challenging same order dismissed for non-prosecution; no fresh cause of action shown.

4 May 2010

The petitioner, R.B. Upadhyay, filed a consumer complaint against Vodafone Essar Ltd. (respondent No.2) for deficiency of service on 20 March 2008, al...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)