Search Results for "Compromise Settlement"

816 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 816 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.8-11 in Property Suit — Consent Terms Accepted Despite Objections from Other Defendants. Partial Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Does Not Affect Rights of Non-Settling Defendants Who May Continue to Contest the Suit.

The suit was filed by 35 plaintiffs seeking a declaration that they are purchasers of certain property. The matter was listed for settlement as the pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Dismissing Compromise Petition in Partition Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Trial Court Failed to Examine Genuineness of Compromise and Consent of Parties, Leading to Remand for Fresh Consideration.

The petitioner, Shri K M Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05.01.2016 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Lok Adalat Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Compromise Decree Held Final Under Section 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act. Consideration in Compromise Agreement is Implicit in Mutual Settlement, Not Subject to Challenge Under Indian Contract Act.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the judgment debtor (applicant) challenging the order dated 6.4.2017 passed by the executing C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash Compromise Decree in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Held That Compromise Decree Was Not Validly Passed as It Was Based on a Consent Term That Was Contrary to Law and Without Jurisdiction.

The case involves a dispute over property ownership. The original petitioner, Narhar Rango Kulkarni (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Property Dispute Over Compromise Decree Registration. Compromise Decree Arising from Family Settlement Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Under Section 17(2)(vi) of Registration Act, 1908, as Parties Had Pre-existing Rights as Heirs.

The dispute involved two sons of late Vijendra Singh contesting ownership of ancestral land. The appellant filed a suit for possession in 1978, disput...