Search Results for "Comparative Hardship"

130 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Bona Fide Need for Hotel Business Established. Landlord's son's need for premises to start hotel business held genuine and reasonable under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the applicants (original defendants) for possession of suit p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition for Eviction on Ground of Reasonable and Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Landlord's Own Witness Admitted No Need for Possession, Defeating Claim Under Rent Control Law.

The petitioners, landlords of commercial premises in Kolhapur, filed a suit for eviction against the tenant on grounds of non-user, erection of perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Case Based on Landlord's Reasonable and Bonafide Requirement. Comparative Hardship Not in Tenant's Favor as Landlord's Need Outweighed Tenant's Hardship.

The petitioners, tenants of a suit premises, challenged the judgment and decrees dated 12th August 1985 and 12th January 1998 passed by the trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint After 30 Years in Property Suit — No Prejudice as Trial Not Commenced. Pre-Trial Amendment Permissible Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Despite Delay, as No New Cause of Action Introduced.

The present writ petition arises out of a civil suit filed in 1993 by the original plaintiffs, Smt. Bertha Carvalho and Shri Ross Carvalho, against th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Landlord's Bonafide Need Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Concurrent findings on bonafide need and hardship not interfered with under Section 115 CPC as they were not perverse.

The petitioners, original defendants/tenants, challenged the concurrent eviction decrees passed by the trial court and the first appellate court under...