Search Results for "Common Amenities"

723 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 723 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Housing Society and Members Against Builder and Flat Owners in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court Holds That Dispute Over Construction of Additional Floors and Common Amenities Is Not Maintainable Without Proper Evidence of Title and Breach of Contract.

The appellants, Shangrilla Apartments Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and its members, filed a suit (Special Civil Suit No.130/2000) before the Civil Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Order Directing Grant of Amenity TDR for Garden Development. High Court Allowed Writ Petition Challenging BMC's Denial of TDR and Directed Grant of Additional Amenity TDR Under Section 126 of MRTP Act.

The dispute centers on the entitlement to additional amenity Transferable Development Rights (TDR) for a garden developed on land reserved for a publi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Involving Parking Amenity Dispute Under Article 226. Court Finds That Alteration of Parking Amenity Raises Public Law Concerns Requiring Planning Authority to Regard Public Convenience and Safety.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated a writ petition filed by Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society against Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs BBMP to Consider Apartment Owners' Complaint Against Building Licence Granted Over Common Amenity Area. Undivided Share in Entire Property Conveyed by Sale Deeds Includes Land Reserved for RWHU and STP; Builder Cannot Unilaterally Alter Approved Plan.

The petitioner, Keerthi Harmony Apartment Owners Association, challenged a building licence granted by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.323 OF 2000

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various companies, including Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in MOFA Dispute Over Common Areas and Parking Rights. Developer restrained from constructing on open space and selling car parks as they are common facilities under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The dispute arises from a development project known as Phoenix Towers in Parel, Mumbai. The appellants, Phoenix Construction Company and another, are ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considered Interim Relief in Arbitration Petitions Over Access to Common Amenities at Lodha World Towers. Dispute Over FCAM Charges and Contractual Escalation Clauses Led to Analysis Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns a batch of petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by high networth individuals who purch...