Search Results for "Commissioner Clarification"

930 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 930 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Appeal Against Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Appointing Trustees to Vishwa Punarnirman Sangha Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Question of Maintainability of Appeal Against Administrative Directions Under Section 41‑A Referred to Division Bench

The appeal arose from an order dated 19 May 2016 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Mumbai, in Application No. 74/2015 under Sections 47 and 41...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension and Departmental Inquiry Against Municipal Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction. Suspension Order Passed by Municipal Commissioner Instead of General Body Held Invalid Under Section 57 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The petitioner, Mr. Sanjay G. Gharat, an employee of the Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC), challenged the suspension order dated 18th Jun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-lifting of Liquor by CL-9 Licensees. Court Decides in Light of Earlier Decision in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant, Allowing Petitioners to Raise Further Grounds.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by various CL-9 license holders, including bars and restaurants, challenging the imposition o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-Lifting of Liquor. The court heard arguments on additional grounds after noting that the issue was covered by a previous order in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Case.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of connected writ petitions filed by several CL-9 licence holders, including M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in White Oats Tax Exemption Case — Commodity Held Exempt Under Entry 16 of KVAT Act, 2003. White Oats Classified as 'Cereals' and 'Food Grains' Entitled to Exemption Despite Processing.

The case involves a batch of 48 revision petitions filed by M/s Pioneer Trading, a partnership firm represented by its partner Smt. Sheela Venkatesh, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Commissioner's Clarification for Lack of Jurisdiction — Commissioner Cannot Invalidate Section 60 Advance Ruling Without Invoking Revisional or Appellate Powers Under KVAT Act.

The petitioner, M/s. Gras Impex Pvt. Ltd., a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act), sought a clarification under ...