Search Results for "Commercial Courts Act, 2015"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Commercial Courts Act, 2015"

1520 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1520 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Dismissing Application for Return of Plaint in Commercial Suit — Territorial Jurisdiction of Commercial Court Determined by Principal Civil Court Under Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The Court held that since the suit property was situated in England and no cause of action arose in Bengaluru, the Commercial Court lacked territorial jurisdiction, and the plaint must be returned for presentation before the competent court.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioners, M/s Tefilah Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director Siddhartha Gupta, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.

17 Feb 2025

The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Return of Plaint in Summary Suit, Holds Dispute Not Commercial Under Commercial Courts Act. Assignment of Debt by Leasing Company Not an Ordinary Transaction of Financier or Trader Under Section 2(1)(c)(i) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

11 Nov 2024

The case involves an Interim Application filed by Defendant No. 1 (Varanium Cloud Limited) seeking return of the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 of the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Execution Proceedings — Attachment of Amount Deposited in Another Suit Not Permissible Without Proper Procedure Under Order 21 Rule 46 CPC. Decree holder cannot bypass execution procedure by seeking attachment of a sum deposited in a different suit under Section 151 CPC without following Order 21 Rule 46 CPC.

19 Jul 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Sarasamma C., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21.01.2023 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Condone Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Mandatory 120-Day Limit Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Applies. Court holds that the proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 CPC as amended by Section 16 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is a special provision for commercial disputes and overrides the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, 1980.

10 Jun 2024

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit before the Bombay High Court, seeking to quash the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Commercial Summary Suit Cases — Triable Issues Raised on Guarantee and Limitation. Court holds that existence of disputed facts regarding limitation and discharge of guarantor requires unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

22 Sep 2022

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by the defendants against the dismissal of their applications for leave to defend in commercial ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.

1 Aug 2019

The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

24 May 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Return of Plaint in Commercial Dispute Case — Immovable Property Not Used Exclusively in Trade or Commerce. Agreement to Sell and Mortgage Deed Registration Dispute Falls Outside Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Land Was Not Pled to Be Used for Trade or Commerce.

1 Jan 2019

The appellant, Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd., filed a Commercial Civil Suit No. 41/2018 before the Commercial Court at Vadodara seeking enforcemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

14 Sep 2017

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)