Search Results for "Clean and dried bottles"

5 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Take Samples in Clean and Dried Bottles as Required Under Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Prosecution Unreliable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Ashishkumar Dineshkumar Patel, proprietor of M/s. New Rajashiri Oil Depot, for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Rule 14 and Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Santosh Dattatreya Mamidwar, the accused, challenging his conviction under the Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Vendor for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil Upheld as Sample Not Representative and Rules 14 and 16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Not Followed.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bramhapuri, in Regular Criminal Case No.68 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Sampling of Ice Candy Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dahiwadi, acquitting Bharat Anant Shinde of offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 by Not Adding Preservative to Sample Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector Suresh Vithal Joshi, appealed against the judgment and order dated 3rd April 2001 passed by the Chief...