Search Results for "Class-IV employees"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Job Contract Pension Case — Sets Aside High Court Order Counting Entire Service for Pension. Only limited job-contract service sufficient to render eligibility for pension can be counted under Rule 18(6) of Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992.

The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of appeals filed by the State of Odisha challenging the orders of the Orissa High Court that had dismissed the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in BHU Promotion Case — Estoppel Cannot Override Statutory Service Rules. Board of Examiners Exceeded Jurisdiction by Introducing Interview and Written Test for Promotion from Class IV to Class III Under Banaras Hindu University Manual, Para 6.4.

The case pertains to a challenge by Class IV employees of Banaras Hindu University (BHU) against the promotion of 14 Class IV employees to Class III (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Animal Husbandry Department Against Retired Employees Seeking Pensionary Benefits — Held That Pension Is Not a Bounty but a Right Earned by Service, and Denial Without Proper Justification Is Arbitrary.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by the Commissioner of Animal Husbandry, Maharashtra, and other officers (petitioners) against three retir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Drivers' Petition for Time Bound Promotion Scheme Benefits. Government Resolution dated 17.5.2003 Quashed as Discriminatory Against Drivers in Zilla Parishads.

The petitioners, four drivers employed by Zilla Parishads in Gadchiroli, Amravati, and Chandrapur, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of Governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Attendant Challenging Termination After Caste Claim Invalidated. School Tribunal's finding that petitioner failed to prove permanent appointment prior to cut-off date upheld, disentitling him to protection under MEPS Act.

The petitioner, Gangadhar Harishchandra Nimje, was appointed as an Attendant in a Class IV post in a school run by the respondent society on 12.07.199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Directing Regularization of Daily Wager in Agricultural Produce Market Committee — Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU & PULP Act for Non-Regularization Despite Completion of 240 Days Service and Regularization of Juniors.

The petitioner, Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Hinganghat, challenged the order of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, which allowed the complaint o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Against Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when the employee is already aware of the closure of the establishment.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Municipal Council, Tirora, and its President against common orders passed by the Labour C...