Search Results for "Cinema Regulation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Cinema Regulation"

52 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Direction in Public Interest Litigation on Cinema Hall Food Prohibition. The High Court's order directing cinema hall owners not to prohibit carrying outside food was challenged as exceeding jurisdiction under Article 226, with the Supreme Court considering the right to choice of food under Article 21 and the Jammu and Kashmir Cinemas (Regulation) Rules 1975.

3 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India considered appeals against a judgment dated 18 July 2018 by a Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. The ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Canceling Cinema License for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Speaking Order. Appellate Authority Under Section 8A of Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Cannot Cancel License Without Recording Findings on Grounds Under Section 6.

27 Oct 2010

The petitioners, Deepak Joshi and the legal representatives of Ravi K. Appu, challenged an order dated 28.01.1999 passed by the State Minister (Home),...

High Court

High Court Quashes Municipal Notice for Trade Licence on Cinema Exhibition Under Karnataka Municipalities Act. Cinema Exhibition Held Exclusively Regulated by Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964, Not Subject to Municipal Trade Licence Under Section 256 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964.

5 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a notice issued by the Chief Officer of the City Municipal Council, Chintamani, directing the petitioners, and its proprie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Family Property Dispute — Allegations of Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating Found to Be Civil in Nature. Dispute over partnership firm and film rights held not to constitute criminal offences under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC as no criminal intent established.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a family dispute among the Mehra family over a partnership firm and film rights. The petitioners (Umesh Mehra, Rajesh Mehra, Rajiv M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharvan Developers Private Limited and others, and by Jayesh Mehta and others, challenging a demolition ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case Under UP Urban Buildings Act, 1972. Prescribed Authority's finding of bona fide need and comparative hardship under Section 21(1)(a) reinstated as Appellate Authority's reversal lacked sufficient reasoning.

24 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a landlord-tenant dispute over a cinema building in Allahabad. The appellant, successor-in-interest to Murlidhar Aggarwal, sough...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Entertainment Duty on Unutilised Service Charges Collected by Cinema Theatre Owner. Service charges collected under Section 2(b) proviso of Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923, if not fully spent, are liable to entertainment duty as part of the value of the ticket.

15 Nov 2006

The petitioner, Shri Lilachand Navalmal Shah, proprietor of Shiva Parvati Chitra Mandir, a cinema theatre in Islampur, Sangli, filed a writ petition c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices Issued by Nagpur Improvement Trust for Alleged Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that show cause notices under Section 53 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 must be served on the owner or person in possession, and that the Trust cannot demolish without giving an opportunity of hearing.

19 Mar 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by owners of flats in Nagpur challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order of Attachment Before Judgment in Commercial Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established. Court held that the balance of convenience did not favor the appellants and that the trial court's discretion in ordering attachment before judgment under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was not perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal against an order of attachment before judgment passed by the trial court in a commercial suit. The appellants, who were de...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Projectionist in Qualification Dispute — License Obtained After Appointment Valid Under Rule 68(2-A) of Rajasthan Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1959. The court held that Rule 68(2-A) permits obtaining operator certificate within three months of appointment, and the appellant's acquisition after appointment was valid compliance.

24 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court which set aside the appointment of the appellant, Gangaram, as Proj...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)