Search Results for "Chennai Metro Rail Limited"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Promotion in Cooperative Bank, Reverses High C...
Supreme Court Grants Leave and Examines High Court's Interpretation of Section 3...

Search Results for "Chennai Metro Rail Limited"

22 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal by Chennai Metro Rail Ltd. in Land Acquisition Dispute — Government Land Transfer Upheld Over Private Ownership Claims. Grama Natham Land Classified as Government Property Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, Not Subject to Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jun 2026

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by the Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) and its officers against an order of a single judge dated 02.04...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Official Assignee to Sell Insolvent's Property in Insolvency Proceedings — Property Not Subject to Attachment Under Section 60 CPC as It Was Not in Possession of Insolvent at Time of Adjudication. The Court held that upon adjudication, all property of the insolvent vests in the Official Assignee under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, and attachment before judgment does not prevent such vesting.

27 Feb 2026

The case arises from insolvency proceedings against Arjunlal Sunderdas (the insolvent). The Official Assignee, representing the estate of the insolven...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Compensation Payment for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail Project - No Objection Letter Required from Housing Board. Landowner's Entitlement to Compensation Recognized Based on Allotment Order and Sale Deeds Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioner, M. Krishnaveni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second r...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notice for Chennai Metro Station. Petitioner's challenge centered on whether CMRL's show cause notice under Section 3(2) of Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 was vitiated by post-decisional hearing after CMRL undertook before court in an earlier PIL to acquire the land.

11 Mar 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by United India Insurance Company Limited, challenging a show cause notice ...

High Court

Madras High Court Addressed Appeal and Writ Petition by Elevator Company Challenging Procurement Eligibility Clause in JICA Loan Agreement — Controversy Centered on Constitutionality of Nationality Restriction Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India and Section 27 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

11 Mar 2025

The matter arose from writ petitions and writ appeals filed by OTIS Elevator Company (India) Limited before the Madras High Court. The appellant chall...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Metro Rail Soil Investigation Dispute; Undertaking to Mitigate Damage Renders Petition Unnecessary. Court Holds That Public Project Undertaking Provides Sufficient Protection for Affected Occupants, Making Further Judicial Intervention Inappropriate.

11 Mar 2025

The appellant, Meston Education and Development Association (P) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 31.07.2024 issued by the Chenna...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Plaintiff’s Suit for Declaration of Title and Compensation for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail. Suit Filed Under CPC Order VII Rule 1 and Madras High Court Original Side Rules Seeks Compensation for Grama Natham Land in Saligramam Village.

2 Feb 2025

The plaintiff, D. Shankar, instituted Civil Suit No. 725 of 2018 before the Madras High Court seeking a declaration of ownership over three parcels of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award Set Aside by Commercial Court. Court Restores Arbitral Award Holding That the Commercial Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence.

29 Aug 2024

The case involves a commercial dispute between Navayuga Engineering Company (appellant) and Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited along with other ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in National Green Tribunal Act Case Upholding Illegal Storage Facility Removal. Ex Post Facto Clearance Under 2011 Notification Invalid as Storage Terminal Not Located 'In' Notified Port Under Paragraph 8 of Environment Protection Act, 1986.

1 Feb 2023

The appeals were lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging the National Green Tribunal's order that set aside an e...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)