Search Results for "Chennai Corporation"

510 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 510 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses BSNL's Challenge to CAT Order on Pension Revision for Pre-2007 Retirees. Court upholds applicability of BSNL Pension Rules, 2007 to employees who retired before 01.10.2007, rejecting the argument that pension revision is limited to post-2007 retirees.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), and its officers challenging the order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Non-Compliance with Procedural Requirements. Notice Issued Beyond Four-Year Limit Without Proper Sanction and Without Disclosing Reasons for Alleged Income Escaping Assessment.

The petitioner, Chennai Container Terminal Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice dated 26 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds District Collector's Order Declaring Land Reserved for Public Park in Approved Layout — Sale Deed Void for Lack of Authority. The court held that common areas in a layout cannot be alienated and the District Collector's order directing removal of encroachments was valid.

The writ petition was filed challenging the order of the District Collector, Chennai District, dated 25.03.2024, which held that the subject property ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Review Petition to Correct Clerical Error in Writ Order Regarding Gifted Land. Court Held That Review Is Maintainable for Correction of Clerical or Arithmetical Mistakes Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The case involves a review petition filed by J.H.Najumudeen, the petitioner, seeking correction of a clerical error in the order dated 05.01.2026 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Injunction Against Eviction Due to Pending Civil Suit. Writ of Mandamus for forbearance from eviction is not maintainable when civil suit and appeal are already pending.

The petitioner, P.Devaraj, filed a Writ Petition (WP No. 3628 of 2025) before the Madras High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Eviction of Encroachers from Water Body Due to Lack of Evidence. Petitioner Failed to Produce Revenue Records or Survey Report, Court Held That Disputed Questions of Fact Cannot Be Adjudicated Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Lion.G.Devarajan, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the government respondents to consider his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachment on Public Park Land — Directs Authorities to Restore Land for Public Use. The court held that land reserved for a park/play area cannot be encroached upon and must be maintained for the community's benefit.

The petitioner, R. Mohan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Lock and Seal of Residential Property. Challenge Pertains to Notice Issued by Greater Chennai Corporation Without Adequate Reasoning Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The writ petition, numbered W.P.No.25467 of 2024, was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Madras under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its jurisdiction as contract was executed and performed in Chennai, and arbitration venue was Chennai.

The petitioner, M/s. Roman Tarmat Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an injunction restrain...