Search Results for "CVD"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of CVD Paid on Imported Mobile Phones Under Exemption Notification. The court held that the exemption notification No.12/2012-Customs applies to imports and directed reconsideration of refund claims subject to verification of unjust enrichment.

The petitioner, Micromax Informatics Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, imported mobile handsets during July 2014 to June 2015 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Vessels Imported Prior to Notification. Condition No.82 of Notification 12/2012-Cus. Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Vessels Imported Before Its Effective Date.

The petitioner, The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd., imported two vessels, 'Jag Rishi' and 'Jag Rahul', prior to 17.03.2012. On 17.03.2012, the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against Company in INR 8 Crore Duty Evasion Case Due to Immunity Under Settlement Commission. Appellant-Company exempted from prosecution as per immunity granted by the Settlement Commission, Gujarat High Court's order overturned.

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the Appellant-Company, accused of evading countervailing duty (CVD) to the tune of INR 8 crores...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union's Appeal Against High Court's Setting Aside of Amended Customs Notification. Power to Modify Exemption Under Section 25(1) Customs Act, 1962 Includes Power to Withdraw; No Vested Right to Concessional Duty.

The case involves a challenge to the amendment of a customs exemption notification. The respondent, ABP Pvt Ltd, imported a high-speed printing machin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on CENVAT Credit Restriction for Inputs from 100% EOU. Rule 3(6)(a)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 restricts credit on inputs manufactured by a 100% EOU, and reversal under Rule 3(4) does not remove the restriction.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank of Baroda's Appeal Against High Court Order Quashing Termination of Probationary Employee. Unsatisfactory Performance and Misconduct During Probation Justify Termination Without Stigma.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which allowed the writ petition of the respondent-employee and quashed his termin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Service Tax Case on Design Services. Engineering Design & Drawings Imported for Manufacturing Wind Turbine Generators Held Taxable as 'Design Services' Under Finance Act, 1994.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the CESTAT order which held that 'Engineering Design & Drawings' imported by M/s Suzlon Energy Limi...