Search Results for "CDA Rules"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer Order in ONGC — No Violation of Service Rules Found. Transfer order issued on administrative grounds upheld as petitioner failed to establish mala fides or breach of transfer policy.

The petitioner, Rajinder Paul Bharadwaj, was working as Manager (MM) in the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) at Mumbai. He was transferred ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition by Employee Against National Insurance Co. for Removal from Service Due to Unauthorized Absence. Medical Grounds and Alleged Procedural Lapses Raised Under National Insurance (CDA) Rules, 2014.

The petitioner, a senior assistant in the National Insurance Company, challenged her removal from service following a departmental inquiry for unautho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Leave Encashment Withheld by Employer After Superannuation. Withholding of leave encashment on ground of pending departmental inquiry is impermissible as leave encashment is a vested right and not a gratuity or pension.

The petitioner, Pradip Kumar Roy, was appointed as a Junior Executive Trainee in CMPDI, Ranchi on 01/07/1981 and later transferred to the respondent-C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by Union of India Challenging Central Administrative Tribunal Orders in Service Matters. The Petitions Involve Defence Civilian Employees and Orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The provided judgment text is limited to the case title and party names. No substantive content regarding the facts, issues, arguments, or decision of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010115872016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Dismissed Employee's Entitlement to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Dismissal Constitutes 'Retirement' Under Section 2(q) and Forfeiture Requires Specific Order Under Section 4(6) — Employee Entitled to Gratuity Despite Dismissal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Chairman cum Managing Director of Western Coalfields Ltd. challenging the entitlement of respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Charge-sheet and Penalty Set Aside Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Disproportionate Punishment.

The petitioner, Abha Chawla Mohanty, was an employee of the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appointed in October 1985. She was served with a charge-sheet ...