Search Results for "Burial ground reservation"

52 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners in Lapsing of Reservation Case; Directs Notification of Lapsing Within Two Months. Reservation for Burial Ground Lapsed as No Declaration Under Section 19 of 2013 Act Issued Within 24 Months of Purchase Notice Under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

The petitioners, owners of land bearing survey No. 117/4 in Village Sangmeshwar, Taluka Malegaon, District Nashik, filed a writ petition under Article...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reservation Condition in Development Permission Dispute. MHADA Housing Reservation Deleted by Sanctioned Modification to Development Plan, Municipal Corporation Cannot Insist on Compliance.

The petitioner, Cosmos Constructions, a partnership firm, owned land at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane. The Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) imposed Condi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Wakf Property Dispute — Suit Land Declared Wakf Property Based on Historical Evidence of Use as Burial Ground. High Court Erred in Reversing Single Judge's Finding That Land Was Wakf Property Under Wakf Act, 1995.

The appeals arise from a judgment of the Madras High Court which set aside the decree of the Single Judge declaring the suit land as wakf property. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reservation of Land for Burial Ground in Ulhasnagar Development Plan. Petitioners, as mere occupants without title, lack standing to challenge the notification under Section 31 of the MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioners, residents of structures on site Nos. 244 and 245 in Ulhasnagar, challenged a notification dated 23rd April 2018 issued under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...