Search Results for "Bombay Stamp Act 1958"

315 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Deficit Stamp Duty Demand — Limitation Period Under Section 32-A(1) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Is Mandatory. Demand for deficit stamp duty and penalty made after 5 years from execution of instrument is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.

The petitioner, Meena Shyam Tulsani, purchased a commercial office premises admeasuring 351 sq.ft super built up area in 1999 through a notarized agre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Maharashtra Stamp Act Amendment on Advertisements. Petition Seeks Declaration that Imposition of Stamp Duty on Mass Media Advertising Contracts is Unconstitutional and Void.

The Advertising Agencies Association of India and several other entities representing advertising, newspaper publishing, and broadcasting sectors file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Stamp Duty Adjudication Case — Holds Adjudication Under Section 31 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Final and Binding. Reopening of Adjudication After 20 Years Under Section 53A Is Without Jurisdiction and Barred by Delay.

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Reassessment Order Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Collector's order set aside for failing to consider petitioner's objections and relying on unsubstantiated ready reckoner rates without providing opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, Crystal Construction Company, challenged an order dated 16 September 2021 passed by the Collector of Stamps, Andheri, which adjudicate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Advocate's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Court Fee Stamps. Section 52B of Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Held Inapplicable to Court Fee Stamps Under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed a civil suit for possession valued at Rs. 40,500 and paid court fee of Rs. 4,530 using stamps. The court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRT's Power to Impound Unstamped Memorandum of Entry Under Bombay Stamp Act — Instrument Executed Outside State but Produced in Evidence Before Tribunal Properly Impounded.

The petitioner, M/s. WinnQuiz Company Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 16 August 2010. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Exhibition of Insufficiently Stamped Agreement to Sale Subject to Payment of Stamp Duty and Penalty — Section 34 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Does Not Bar Exhibition for Collateral Purpose

The petitioner, original plaintiff, filed Special Civil Suit No.904 of 2005 for specific performance of an agreement to sale dated 31-1-2005 in respec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Bombay Stamp Act Provisions on Sale Certificates in Execution Proceedings. Interpretation of 'Instrument' under Section 147 of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Not Extended to Bombay Stamp Act.

The case involves a reference under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, made by the Principal District Judge, Aurangabad, to the Bombay ...