Search Results for "Bombay High Court PIL Rules"

436 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 436 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Public Interest Litigation – Suppression of Material Facts – Criminal Contempt – Maintainability of PIL. High Court dismissed the PIL on grounds of suppression of facts, lack of bona fides, and scandalizing the court. Criminal contempt was noted but no proceedings were initiated.

Litigants filing PIL must disclose all material facts and approach the court with clean hands. Scandalizing the court through social media can constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Regarding Encroachments and Treats One as PIL to Monitor Supreme Court Directions. The Court Issued Rule and Heard Matters Finally, but the Complete Order and Findings Were Not Available in the Judgment Excerpt.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various religious trusts and societies against the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Government Pleaders and Public Prosecutors. Court upholds State's prerogative in appointing law officers as petitioner failed to establish illegality or mala fides.

The petitioner, Mr. A.S. Shirsat, a practising advocate from Jalgaon Courts, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Alleging Corruption by Senior Police Officers in Pune CID. Court finds PIL based on newspaper reports without verification, lacking public interest and bona fides.

The petitioner, Citizens Organisation for Public Opinion, claiming to be an NGO formed in 1989, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment on Challenges to Additional Fees Imposed by Central Motor Vehicles Rules. Rule 32 and Rule 81 Under Scrutiny for Alleged Unlawful Levy on Delayed Renewals and Transfers

The Bombay High Court heard a public interest litigation (PIL No.130 of 2022) filed by ‘K’ Savakash Auto Rickshaw Sangha, a registered trust, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Approval as Abuse of Process. Court finds lack of bonafides and imposes costs of Rs. 5,00,000 for misuse of public interest litigation jurisdiction.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sarthi Seva Sangh and another petitioner, challenging the approval of an a...