Search Results for "Bid premium"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against MMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium on Alleged Construction Delay. Court Examines Whether Demand is Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 Given Delays Attributed to the Authority.

The present writ petition was filed by Shree Naman Hotels Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of Shree Naman Developers Ltd., against the Mumbai Metropolitan Regi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Against MMRDA Regarding Levy of Additional Premium on Leasehold Land. Petitioner Assails Demand Notice as Contrary to Lease Agreement and Arbitrary.

The Writ Petition was instituted challenging the Demand Notice dated 9th September 2014 issued by Respondent No.1 – Mumbai Metropolitan Region Devel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines

The Petitioner No.1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, successfully bid for a plot in Bandra-Kurla Complex leased by the Mumbai Me...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.

The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Cancellation of Tender Process for Lease of Plots. Court holds that CIDCO's decision to cancel tender without valid reasons and without issuing show-cause notice to highest bidders is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, M/s. Aditya Enterprises and Mahaavir Superstructures Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challenging the decision of the City and Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by DISCOMs and Generating Companies in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Change in Law Compensation for Coal Shortfall Must Be Computed Based on Actual GCV and SHR as per PPAs.

The judgment involves two civil appeals concerning the determination of compensatory tariff for Change in Law events under long-term Power Purchase Ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation by MHADA in Redevelopment Project. Court Holds That Cancellation Before Opening of Price Bids Is Not Arbitrary When Done in Public Interest and for Valid Reasons.

The petitioners, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Private Limited and its director, challenged the cancellation of an e-tender issued by the Maharashtra H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...