Search Results for "Bail Orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Bail Orders"

2292 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2292 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Inadequate Verification of In-Camera Statements. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Bail Orders and In-Camera Statements Were Not Properly Verified Under Section 3 of MPDA Act, 1981.

30 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Abhishek Pradip Tarkase, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offende...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Orders Renders Detention Invalid. The detaining authority's omission to consider bail orders in the criminal cases relied upon as grounds of detention vitiates the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

10 Oct 2006

The petitioner, father of the detenu Sanjay Ramrup Gupta, challenged the detention order dated 21/10/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Unverified In-Camera Statements Renders Detention Invalid Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug offenders, Dangerous persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

19 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Lakhan Rohidas Jagtap, challenged a preventive detention order dated 15 March 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Communal, Anti social and other Dangerous Activities Act, 1980 — Non-Application of Mind to Vital Documents. Detaining Authority's Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Witness Statements Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3 of the Act.

3 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Gopal Bhujangrao Kadam, was detained under a preventive detention order passed by the District Magistrate, Akola on 13.4.2018 under Se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction — Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material of Detenue's Release on Bail in Similar Cases. The court held that non-placement of bail orders before the detaining authority vitiates the detention order under Section 3(1) of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985.

25 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Shankara Gouda, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Ga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and In-camera Statements Renders Detention Invalid

21 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Shamim Makmood Khan, mother of detenu Firoj @ Babbali Maqbul Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 16 October 2019 passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Failure to Consider Bail Orders. Non-consideration of bail in pending criminal cases under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 vitiates subjective satisfaction under Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

15 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Elizabeth Ranibhai Prabhudas Gaikwad, challenged the preventive detention orders passed by the State of Maharashtra and the Collector ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Against Bootlegger Under MPDA Act — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Inadequate Verification of Witness Statements Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority did not consider bail orders and verification of anonymous witnesses was flawed, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

8 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Dhanubai @ Dhanno Yashvant Netlekar, challenged an order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon, detaining her as...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention under Goonda Act – Allegations of Non-Supply of Documents and Procedural Violations. Detenu Contends That Order Lacks Subjective Satisfaction and Fails to Comply with Section 10 and Section 3(2) Proviso of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985.

14 Aug 2025

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the wife of the detenu, Md. Rustum Ahmed @ Rustum, challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under M.P.D.A. Act for Non-Placement of Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority — Failure to Consider Vital Material Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid. The court held that bail conditions imposed by courts are vital material that must be placed before the detaining authority for consideration before recording subjective satisfaction under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

23 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Baban Prakash Ranware, challenged a detention order dated 14.2.2012 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune under the Maharashtra P...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)