Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

6368 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6368 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Orders of Ombudsman under Mahatma Gandhi Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. Petitions Filed by Government Servants and Private Individuals Seeking to Quash Recovery and Penalty Orders Passed by Ombudsman.

1 Jan 1970

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging orders passed by the Ombudsman unde...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Hears Challenge by Additional Government Pleaders and Public Prosecutors Against Termination Clause in Fresh Appointment Advertisement. Court Examines Whether Clause 7 of 13.03.2015 Advertisement Amounts to Illegal Termination in Violation of Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984, and Article 14 of Constitution of India.

5 May 2015

The petitioners, functioning as Additional Government Pleaders, Assistant Government Pleaders, and Additional Public Prosecutors in the High Court of ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Dismisses Second Appeal Upholding Concurrent Decrees of Perpetual Injunction in Agricultural Land Dispute. Appellate Court's Failure to Frame Specific Points Under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC Did Not Vitiate Judgment Where Core Issues Were Adequately Discussed.

13 Jan 2010

This second appeal arose from a suit for perpetual injunction filed by the respondents/plaintiffs in respect of certain agricultural lands against the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Delegation of Power under Section 17(2) of Working Journalists Act in Disputes Over Newspaper Employee Dues. The Court Considered Whether a State Government Could Delegate Its Power to Refer a Question as to Amount Due to a Labour Court to Another Authority.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from two judgments of the High Court of Bombay: the Aurangabad Bench judgment dated 2022-12-22 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeals Against Special Court Orders Outside Bench's Territorial Limits Lie Only to Principal Seat. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Location of Court, Not Place of Offence Under Chapter XXXI of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

24 Apr 2024

The case involved a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad to determine the territorial jurisdiction for appeals against o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Aurangabad Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Parole Rejection Order Passed at Nashik Central Prison — Reference Answered in Favor of Respondent Prisoner. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Place of Confinement and Communication of Order, Not Solely by Location of Prison Authority.

25 Jan 2021

The case arose from a reference made by a division bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad regarding its territorial jurisdiction to entertain a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Return of Plaint for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Association Name and Monogram. Court holds that under Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, jurisdiction is determined by the location of the defendant's residence or the cause of action, and mere authorization to file suit does not confer jurisdiction.

2 Apr 2014

The appellant, Akhil Bhartiya Grahak Panchayat, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 with its registered office in Delhi, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer of Suit for Specific Performance on Ground of Territorial Jurisdiction. Agreement Executed at Aurangabad Confers Jurisdiction Under Section 20(c) CPC, Despite Property Being in Vaijapur.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of contract of sale and perpetual injunction in the Court of Civil Judge S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Order in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Complaint Filed at Aurangabad Not Maintainable as Cheque Was Drawn and Presented at Pune. Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Determined by Place of Presentation and Dishonour, Not Complainant's Registered Office.

10 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Rajendra Marga Gaikwad, proprietor of Yashraj Agencies at Pune, was the original accused in a complaint filed by Kail Limited (formerl...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Claimant's Residence Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. MACT Aurangabad had jurisdiction as claimant resided within its territorial limits, despite accident occurring elsewhere.

6 Dec 2022

The appellant, Navnath s/o Shripati Bhawar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accident Claims...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)