Search Results for "Article 164"

628 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 628 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court examines legality of appointing persons with criminal background as Ministers. Interpretation of Articles 75 and 164 of the Constitution to uphold democratic integrity and combat criminalisation of politics.

The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed as a public interest litigation by the petitioner, Manoj Narula, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Defacto Complainant's Petition Seeking Summoning of Magistrate in POCSO Case Citing Absence of Signatures on Victim's Statement. Court Holds That Non-Signing of Section 164 Statement Does Not Vitiate Its Admissibility and Directs Expeditious Trial Completion.

The matter pertained to a writ petition filed by the defacto complainant, the father of a minor girl who was allegedly sexually assaulted at Vibgyor H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Directors' Petition Against Disqualification of DINs in Companies Act Case — Violation of Article 19(1)(g) Right to Practice Profession. Blocking of Director Identification Numbers without Notice and Hearing Held Illegal Under Section 164(2) of Companies Act, 2013.

The petitioners, Mr. Dilipraj Pukkella and Mr. Muhammed Imthiyaz, directors of M/s. Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...