Search Results for "Article 16"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Age Limit for Promotion of Anganwadi Sevikas to Supervisors. Rule 7(1)(c) of Service Entry Rules, 2021, prescribing 45 years as maximum age for promotion, held not violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution.

The petitioners, ten Anganwadi Sevikas from Akola district, challenged Rule 7(1)(c) of the Service Entry Rules, 2021, which prescribed a maximum age l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Challenge to 103rd Constitutional Amendment Providing 10% EWS Reservation to Constitution Bench. The Court finds substantial questions of law regarding basic structure and interpretation of Articles 15(6) and 16(6) warranting a five-judge bench hearing.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of writ petitions, considered the constitutional validity of the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reservation for In-service Candidates in Postgraduate Medical Courses — State Government's Policy of Granting Weightage to In-service Candidates for 50% of Seats in Government Medical Colleges Held Valid and Not Violative of Article 14 or 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, who were candidates for admission to postgraduate medical courses in Maharashtra, challenged the State Government's policy of grantin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Providing Reservation for Earthquake Affected Persons in Government Employment. Mandal Commission Recommendations for Disaster Affected Persons Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two public interest litigations challenging the validity of a Government Resolution dated 17th November 1994 issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging MPSC's Method of Awarding Marks for Incorrect Questions in Recruitment Examination. Court holds that awarding zero marks for incorrect questions is arbitrary and directs MPSC to award marks for all candidates who attempted the incorrect questions.

The petitioners, four candidates who applied for the post of Deputy Collector in the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) recruitment examinat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pilots' Challenge to Command Training Selection in Air India — No Violation of Articles 14 and 16 Found. Selection based on seniority and merit was not arbitrary; employer's decision to withdraw earlier offer was justified due to operational exigencies.

The petitioners, pilots of Air India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30th September 2004 by wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...