Search Results for "Article 136 Limitation Act"

237 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 237 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution of Foreign Decree Case, Holding Limitation Period of 12 Years Runs from Date of Foreign Decree. Bank of Baroda's Execution Petition Filed 14 Years After London Decree Held Time-Barred Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute between Bank of Baroda (appellant) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (respondent, successor of Vysya Bank) regarding the limita...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SFC Petition Against Guarantors Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act, 1951 — Guarantors Liable Despite Company's Winding Up. Guarantee is a separate contract and liability of guarantor is co-extensive with principal debtor under Section 128 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Limitation Dispute Over Alternative Plot Allotment. Concurrent Findings on Time-Barred Declaratory Suit Upheld Under Article 136 of Constitution, Applying Limitation Act 1963 Provisions to Determine Starting Point of Limitation.

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the appellants seeking declaratory reliefs regarding ownership of an alternative residential plot allotted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Commercial Suit, Rejecting Limitation Bar Under Article 137. Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Held Inapplicable to Applications for Amendment of Pleadings, Allowing Defendants to Elaborate Existing Defences.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by defendant nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 in Suit No. 2256 of 1998 pending before the Bombay High Court. The defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Gauhati High Court Decision Striking Down Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 for Repugnancy with Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Diploma in Medicine and Rural Health Care Held to Be a Medical Qualification Requiring Central Permission Under Section 10A of IMC Act.

The case involves appeals against the Gauhati High Court's judgment striking down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The Assam Act...