Search Results for "Arbitrary Discrimination"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Judicial Review of State Actions in Contractual Disputes: Evolution and Current Scope. From Traditional Boundaries to Modern Oversight: Ensuring Fairness and Transparency in State Contractual Matters

The evolution of judicial review in India regarding state actions in contractual and tender disputes. Historically, such disputes were seen as private...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgments on Creamy Layer Determination for OBC Reservation in Civil Services. Inclusion of Salary Income for PSU Employees Under Category II(C) of Office Memorandum Dated 08.09.1993 Found Discriminatory and Set Aside Due to Violation of Article 14.

The Supreme Court dealt with three consolidated civil appeals arising from separate High Court judgments concerning the determination of creamy layer ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Petitions of Retired High Court Judges for Full Pension Including District Judiciary Service. Services Rendered as District Judges Must Be Counted for Full Pension Under High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954.

The Supreme Court in this suo motu writ petition and connected matters addressed multiple issues concerning pension and other retirement benefits paya...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 18A of SC/ST Act Against Challenge of Unconstitutionality — Amendment Restores Pre-Dr. Subhash Kashinath Position After Review

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of Section 18A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Age Limit for Promotion of Anganwadi Sevikas to Supervisors. Rule 7(1)(c) of Service Entry Rules, 2021, prescribing 45 years as maximum age for promotion, held not violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution.

The petitioners, ten Anganwadi Sevikas from Akola district, challenged Rule 7(1)(c) of the Service Entry Rules, 2021, which prescribed a maximum age l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Award of Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Involved in Factory Altercation. The court held that the domestic enquiry was fair and the compensation of 30 months' wages was appropriate under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petition was filed by the Rayon Workers' Union and the workman, Dinesh Pratap Singh, challenging the award of the 4th Labour Court at Thane in Ref...