Search Results for "Allottee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Allottee"

254 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 254 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

22 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty Imposed by MUDA on Allottee for Violation of Natural Justice — Penalty Without Show Cause Notice Set Aside. Succession Rights Recognized and Authority Directed to Follow Due Process Before Imposing Penalty.

20 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Radhika Bhat, filed a writ petition challenging an endorsement dated 23-11-2016 issued by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Possession of Requisitioned Flat Due to Laches and Alternative Remedy. Petitioners' claim for derequisition and possession of flat requisitioned under Bombay Land Acquisition Act, 1948 rejected as they failed to challenge the order of allotment to Respondent No.5 and delayed filing.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of a flat in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of certiorari t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition of Allottee in KIADB Act Case — Condition Requiring Prior Permission for Share Transfer Declared Ultra Vires. The Court held that the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board cannot impose restrictions on transfer of shares of an allottee company as such power is not conferred by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

12 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Kamalalayaa Real Estates LLP, a limited liability partnership firm, was allotted land by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Developme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lavasa Corporation's Second Appeals Against RERA Orders, Holding That RERA Has No Jurisdiction Over Complaints Filed Before Its Establishment. The Court ruled that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority cannot entertain complaints regarding agreements executed prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

7 Aug 2018

The judgment involves three second appeals filed by Lavasa Corporation Limited against orders of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses IDBI Bank's Appeal Against KIADB's Cancellation of Land Allotment for Non-Compliance with Allotment Conditions. The Court held that the allotment letter did not create any vested right in the appellant and that the KIADB was justified in cancelling the allotment due to the appellant's failure to pay the balance consideration and execute the lease-cum-sale agreement within the stipulated time.

28 Apr 2026

The appellant, IDBI Bank Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the communication dated 20.12.2022 issued by th...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)